Degrading the Youthful Birthright of Music

 

Has Music Become a Second-Tier Backup?

The popular music YouTuber Rick Beato recently posted a short piece asserting that kids—including his own—have devalued music in their lives by tying its delivery to their smartphones. In his 60s and completely sound-centric, Beato remembers his own youth when collecting and listening to music was a prized means of expressing their own identity. As I noted in the last post, recordings, record stores and radio airplay meant a lot. But his point that 4G and 5G technology as applied to smartphones has changed a lot. I would add that the phone screen partly changed the ratio of our dominant senses by giving communication in general a more visual and less auditory focus.

Sight now dominates over sound in almost all media forms: games, chats, texting, and social media content. To be sure, music is surely still within this mix. Headphones have become standard personal gear for many, in spite of the unfortunate “I’m not in this space” vibe that wearing them passes on to others nearby. But Beato is probably right to assert that contemporary pop music has receded in importance, used as an aural background for other activities. It is less surprising that even the younger among us might not recognize many of the performers on Billboard’s “Hot 100.”

There is also a strange but revealing anomaly that used to be common. These days, no one now sits around and watches a record play. I mean that literally. The mid-century habit was once common among the young where attention was paid on what was being heard. We weren’t exactly in a trance but our visual sense was put on hold in order to focus on the music spinning out of the grooves. As was also true in the heyday of radio, complete listening could put the need to see something on pause.  We have all had the experience of hearing something so intently that our eyes drift into an inactive state.

In terms of my own previous work in The Sonic Imperative (available to download on this site), we are now much less “sound-centric.” And I’ve heard it scores of times: a student struggling with an academic subject complaining that he or she is a “visual thinker.” Learning or entertaining oneself by hearing might seem to have had its day. But it has not.  For reasons explained in the book, the processing of sound still remains our first sense. 

Social Media Dominates 

teens and cell phones

17-year-olds average almost 6 hours a day on social media. While some of that time is allocated to “listening” to music, researchers note that this is background for other activities such as homework, gameplaying or work. In this framework, the music video born in the 1980s was an adaptation and a form of self-defense. The hooks to these videos were often the images added to remain competitive as music television expanded. Even so, it was hard to fault musicians who resisted turning their audio art into a clutter of visual memes.

Add up what is now the default youthful focus on watching short-form videos, and we would get a pretty low index of our sensory experiences. All of the accumulated visual editing yields very little that matters; not the experience of those lucky enough to still be caught by the raptures of music.

 

How Far Can We Bend?

It isn’t like there would be a ‘hard landing’ after escaping from the requirement to perpetuate the fantasies of the President.

Looking at the faces of members of the President’s cabinet as he takes off on another rhetorical tour through the weeds always makes me wonder what the absolute limits are for those who enable him. Think of all the pictures of the cabinet or business leaders lined up for a photo behind the President at the Resolute Desk or in the cabinet room. Most of the time those present seem to exhibit no obvious signs of embarrassment. Interestingly, except for J.D. Vance, few have also found reasons to be elsewhere.

Perhaps it is just me, but I see some signs of pain in the eyes of the Secretary of State whenever the President finds new ways to distance the United States from even more of its former friends and allies. Perhaps I’m wrong; maybe he is all in. But the photo above of Marco Rubio sitting on a couch in the Oval Office does not suggest a man relishing the role he has been asked to play. As with the others, there is an impression of non-engagement. I can’t imagine that Madeleine Albright, James Baker or John Kerry would have been so willing to keep their posts in order to serve an isolationist with contempt for America’s traditional friends. And being the Secretary of State during a period when fewer governments are welcoming must feel like something has gone wrong, especially when international cooperation is a virtual requirement for the position. It isn’t like there would be a ‘hard landing’ if he escaped to a position where he did not have to perpetuate the fantasies of the President.

To be sure, all of those who remain within the Presidential circle are ambitious weather vanes.  And ambition can make us live with a lot of dross to keep a dream alive. That was my excuse for sticking it out for a sociopathic department chair who once promised to doom any chance I might have for a promotion. Luckily for me and what turned into a 47-year career, this person soon retired and expired. If this was a period when I wanted to move on, the idea also faded with my wife’s desire to stay in her local job. Personal circumstances often complicate the question of how far we will bend against from our values and goals.

We could easily extend this analysis to the scores of business and tech billionaires who are only too pleased to be photographed with the President. It’s a puzzle, since these folks could easily be elsewhere. Is their fiduciary duty to their shareholders really that vulnerable? Do they not sense the dissonance between their own productive work and the dithering in the Oval Office supports? Is there really that much of a transactional benefit to “playing nice” with an otherwise shallow leader?  Doesn’t owning an important newspaper and the world’s biggest mega-store free Jeff Bezos from the need to show up for another enabling event?

arguing people 2

The issue of self-induced obedience is not an obscure question. My guess is that half of the people I talk to about their work mention their immediate boss as a good reason to seek another position. Perhaps like the members of Trump’s cabinet, they stay because they sense that they are positioning themselves for a better final act in a newly reconfigured hierarchy. And then there are the mundane but sometimes overwhelming challenges of reorienting one’s personal or family life.

None of this should ignore the possibility that folks smiling behind this self-satisfied president actually share his vision. Never underestimate how a person’s cognitive elasticity can be stretched to blend to embrace even the most implausible fiction.