Tag Archives: presidential leadership

red bar

A Triad of Diminished Institutions

With the three branches of government impaired, have we ever been further from the goal of establishing “a more perfect union?”

We can get lost in the details of daily politics. But looking at the big picture offers little reassurance.  We are used to accusing the President of crippling American democracy by undermining long-held national norms. Attempts to stigmatize and even criminalize diversity programs at universities and elsewhere are only one category of this retrograde behavior. It is now apparent to the nation and most of the world that current our presidential leadership is in dire ruins. Every day Donald Trump provides new examples to lament. Combine this problem with ample evidence that the other two branches of government are also hobbled, and it seems we have drifted further from the goal of establishing “a more perfect union.”

If it is not enough that the Presidency has been shorn of its effectiveness and dignity, the third branch, the United States Supreme Court, has created in its own constitutional crisis. It now regularly yields to an overreaching President who seeks more power and less accountability. As for the second branch of Congress, it has been occupied by a party that has allowed the dismemberment of its formal constitutional powers, including the vital roles of war-making and spending. Passage of a bill for short-term funding of the federal government now counts as a significant legislative achievement.

It is painful to admit, but we are the unhappy recipients of an inverted trifecta that has undermined all three governmental branches. Taking their own paths to ineptness, these frail branches have left us with few chances to further the nation’s collective aspirations. Instead, the branches now function to concentrate power rather than distribute it, reward the wealthy at the expense of ordinary Americans, and accept curbing birthright freedoms. Never has the Constitution looked less relevant as a statement of defined powers as it does now. Philadelphia’s National Constitution Center should spend less time celebrating this increasingly bludgeoned document and more time urgently mobilizing people and ideas to strengthen it. It’s a sad day when we fail to notice that we are honoring what is actually disappearing before our eyes.

To be sure, we have some courageous members of Congress.  And there are important lower federal courts that have upheld judicial ideals, at least until the Supreme Court weighs in. But the Supreme Court has now been given powers that alarms even traditional political conservatives. The decision of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission opened the door for elections to be bought. The court diasasterously ruled that campaign finance is a form of free speech, releasing tsunamis of private money into sometimes tiny congressional races. We may vote this fall, but corporations and others with deep pockets have far more chances to influence outcomes by throwing money at all the modern tools of marketing. Few decisions have done more to harm the idea of one-person-one-vote.

The court has also granted nearly complete presidential immunity from prosecution and total freedom to replace any figure in the myriad federal agencies such as the FCC. No efficient and honest federal bureaucrat is immune from the dead hand of presidential removal. By the end of Trump’s term our agencies will be filled with people who would mostly prefer that their oversight responsibilities be eliminated.

Whether the GOP dominated Congress will be revived by more activist members and Democrats remains to be seen. In the short term our best hope for the recovery of a functioning national government lies with changes in the leadership and competence of the next Congress.

The Menace of Meta-Coverage of the President

Donald Trump has degraded the secular-civic style of traditional political discourse with self-aggrandizing memes.

Journalists are trained to be careful observers and students of the institutions they report on. But we now have a new wrinkle in presidential journalism where the actual substance of an event is nonsense or so thin that its the press is forced to assess the theatrics. Exhibit A is Donald Trump’s post of himself in an A.I. image as a healing Jesus. The absurdity of the image can’t really be explained with the usual and traditional news frames that might include the discussion of administrative or policy considerations. A journalist has no choice but to “read” the items like these in visual terms. Clearly, the visual orientation of Trump’s mind favors expressive content that owes more to the theatrical rather than analytical, adjusting brief statements and images to valorize himself in the garb and scenery of the Pope, a freedom fighter, a king, and so on.  With these images he is not solving problems of governance as much as laying out pathetic examples of self-promotion.

Trump rambo flag

One solution is to treat these attention-getting posts as pure pop art displays, forcing any story about them into a form of meta-journalism, which is reporting about what others are seeing and observing. In the formal language of the Encylopedia of Political Communication, “metacoverage is news about the news media itself or about publicity processes, some of which . . . are covered in terms of how well they succeed at garnering favorable news coverage.”

Thinking broadly, alternate frames of analysis of visual memes might include the perspectives of

-Politics as theater

-Art criticism

-Symbol analysis

-Evidence of Trump’s state of mind

-The traditions of political cartooning

All are possible, but usually beyond what daily journalism is comfortable “reporting.” And all require interpretation, assessment and critical analysis: not what staffers at the AP, or a local television or newspaper operation are accustomed to doing.

short black line

Arguably, Donald Trump has changed the vernacular for political discourse with his self-aggrandizing memes. “Dress Up” is usually a thing that might be seen in kindergarten or adult daycare. Obviously, fantasy role-taking is not a good option for a grounded national leader. It’s narcissim has infantilized his Presidency even more.

Political cartooning from journalists and activists has long been a part of our political discourse, but it is rare to see a leader portray themselves as models of righteousness and adoration, without a hint of irony. Trump’s memes that carry this function are grotesque miscues far removed from conventional forms of presidential leadership. It suggests what we  know: prior to winning office the first time he had no administrative experience, little interest in the details of government, and an aversion to understanding the norms and traditions of national leadership.

Is this a trend?  Political rhetoric used to carry the imprimatur of thoughtful deliberation for the benefit of all. Presidents were once quotable. We can hope he is just an example of one.

Many remember the famous Solidarity poster originally made for the August 1980 Lenin shipyard strike which took place in the Polish town of Gdansk. The lone image of a defiant Gary Cooper from the film western film High Noon was meant to suggest the resolve of the workers to win their fight against the anti-union government. It was rare and eloquent: very different from the overuse of the sloppy imagery now, which resembles a Marvel Comic more than a call to meaningful action.  For sure, this kind of imagery has always been scaled up by activist groups. But a functioning civil society requires so much more.