Tag Archives: Donald Trump

Are Aging Powerbrokers Sinking the Nation?

Shakespeare gave his audiences fair warning about advancing age and the risks of clinging to power. By the end of the play, King Lear is old and crazy, with his dominion in chaos.

There’s a lot of discussion in the popular media about political leaders who have stayed in power too long. Our recent history with Joe Biden at age 82 and Donald Trump at 79 are the most  recent cases of apparent declines in mental stamina, though, in Trump’s case, the evidence is decidedly mixed. Incompetence and dementia can look like the same thing. There is also the example of Mitch McConnell (83) in the Senate, who appears to not have had the good graces to step down when he could keep track of his thoughts. Senator Diane Feinstein of California was incapacitated before she died at 90, and the District of Columbia’s Eleanor Holmes Norton seems to be suffering through the same frailty. On the whole, these cases and others like them feed a cultural norm of impatience with those still in power and showing unusual longevity.

Interestingly, and as a matter of policy, the Church of the Latter-Day Saints picks their oldest elder to be their leader. Dallin H. Oaks will start his term to lead the church at the age of 93, one year older than the recently elected President of the central African state of Cameroon.  By contrast, many commercial airline pilots must retire at the comparatively young age of 65. And surgeons are mostly done by age 70. But just when a trend seems clear, someone like Bernie Sanders (84) comes along,  exciting the young with his articulate and impassioned rebukes of his Senate colleagues and Donald Trump. Sanders is an example for arguing that “age is just a number.” And there is the special case that is New York City, which has just elected 32-year-old Zohran Mamdani as mayor. By comparison, and with some exceptions, many of Sander’s colleagues in Congress–most in their 60s or older–lack the inclination or stamina to be effective legislators.

Shakespeare could have easily imagined the enfeebled American nemisis, King George III, who was 81 when he died. Today, some of Britain’s senior leaders end up in the House of Lords, which has a ceremonial and advisory role in governmental affairs. We have no equivalent of a body of wise old men and women who can apply their experience to intractable national problems. That’s too bad because there are leaders from both parties who could help shape some constructive paths forward for the nation. Easing out President Nixon in 1974, after the Watergate coverup, was arguably easier because of the presence of senior members in both parties who convinced him that it was time to go.

Joe Biden’s struggles to remain alert and coherent were evident at the end of his presidency. Perhaps that is one reason so many Americans are primed to consider whether Trump is able to process information and ideas and, more tellingly, to perform the very presidential necessity of staying on point throughout a presentation. Sadly, even less than a year into his administration, some of his constituents and his counterparts in other nations no longer view him as having the character needed to be a reliable partner.  The General Services Administration will want to count the silverware when he finally leaves the public housing we mistakenly assumed he would leave in tact.

I have sympathy with younger Americans who claim that the nation’s leadership should be in the hands of more nimble minds. There is a lot of grumbling about “boomers” my age who have ostensibly damaged accesibility to the  American dream. Did we give our children too much? Did we grow too isolated and materialistic? Have we sentimentalized the accumulation of wealth at the expense of more universal values? And have we allowed our media to be turned into wall-to-wall distractions that diminish real life experience?

All of these questions are timely. On the other hand, it is easy to be disappointed to discover that many current protesters responding to Trump administration policies are much older than youthful activists in the 1960s. Protests against Isreal on college campuses are an exception. But I have attended recent rallies and marches against Trump-era policies where the age of the average attender seems to be on the far side of 60. That is not going to cut it if we are going to renew this society.

red white blue bar

It is Time for a Convention of National Reconstruction

Such an open-ended national effort would be a welcome breeze of fresh air to help clear out what our stale discourse presently allows.

The nation seems ready to lend support to a formal effort to rebuild traditions, norms and institutions that have been weakened by the Trump administration. It is time for individuals representing the nation’s cities, blue states, federal workers, unions and universities to start the necessary and arduous process of imagining and preparing priorities for quick action when the Congress and Presidency are able to restore civil values that have been honored over the decades. A smarter set of constitutional amendments would have already put us on this path. As it is, we must stand by idly to gain formal political leverage to act in defiance of the sabotage undertaken by this administration.

Obviously, a national convention of patriots to rebuild the nation would admittedly not have formal powers. But as The Guardian’s Thomas Geoghegan notes in his similar call for a convention of blue states, the first continental congress held in Philadelphia had “no apparent legitimacy or precedent,” but still had big consequences.1 The founders had to make a similar decision to act beyond what was possible within the political status quo.

My guess is that there would also be many Republicans who are anxious to reset the nation by considering new, productive, and suitably conservative ideas. Enlisting moderate Republican governors would be a good start. Many have clearly been inhibited by the hyperpartisanship of the Trump wing of the party.

2000px Vertical United States Flag.svg

We could assume that conservative and liberal sides would be willing to come together to make something better. Geoghegan notes that the result may be more theater than specifically deliberative, but such an organized national effort would be a welcome breeze of fresh air beyond what our fetid discourse from our entrenched politicians presently allows.

Initial concerns might include:

*whether the Presidency has the kinds of prerogatives and safeguards that the nation needs,

*whether Congress is too big or small to carry out legislative functions,

*whether money in campaigns should be limited, and

*if more federal functions supported by block grants should be taken over by the states.

Published recommendations receiving the most support could be distributed by receptive media.  Topics like these would benefit by having fresh and younger voices more clearly heard.

Organizations that could convene an ongoing conference of national reconstruction might include good government organizations like Common Cause, The National Conference of State Legislators, The United States Chamber of Commerce, The Brennan Center for Justice, and the Pew Research Center. All have traditionally presented credible work that cuts across rigid partisan lines. All would also have to propose some of the attendees, and sign on to the idea that the nation needs an extraordinary Convention of National Reconstruction.

There is also a tradition of calling on the services of respected former cabinet, state or Senate officials who could use their experience and wisdom to guide such an effort. We had such “wise old men (and women)” who helped the nation through the tough final years of the Nixon administration. We could find and enlist their contemporary counterparts again. Think of individuals like former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman or former CIA Director Leon Panetta. There are many former state and federal office holders who would answer the call to help. And there would be more agreement on ways forward than we might think. The current broken norms, like the politicization of the Department of Justice, go unchecked largely because of the current suppression of open dissent by a vindictive President.

Members could forward high-consensus recommendations to the political parties, the media, and interested trade and professional groups. Many would welcome a “third way” to reinvigorate our national politics.

__________

1https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/oct/05/blue-states-democrats-trump