red concave bar 1

Writing as Creative Invention: Some Suggestions

It is a skill with almost no upward limit for improvement. Regular effort helps, but few of us ever fully master the challenges of communicating our thoughts. 

Hundreds of blog/essays and eight books have consumed most of my adult life. But to be frank, re-reading any piece is bound to produce a few cringes. In hindsight there always seem to be better wording choices than the ones I chose. I never quite achieve the verbal economy and mastery of images like essayist Roger Rosenblatt, now retired in his 80s and, in this sample, celebrating his grandchildren:

Now I have the time and freedom to putter around in their lives, asking this or that, making private jokes. The kids seem to take my attention gladly, or are too polite to tell me they don’t. Either way I have a flourishing garden of young people with whom I can banter to my heart’s content. So I do.

Writing perfection is an elusive goal. It is a form of human invention and at the same time, a test of a writer’s stamina and creativity. Writing for some practical need, such as a report, is rarely much fun. But an author who gets to exercise their muscles in behalf of the pleasures of personal expression may have good reasons to persevere.

joan didion
                    Didion

Few imagine getting any pleasure out of such a solitary activity. Writing requires concentration and mental gymnastics, which is perhaps why so many welcome the chance to give the task to A.I. Why bother with authorship if some of those programs can turn out a passable paragraph?

Here’s why: there is satisfaction in putting your name on a visible piece of your consciousness. Songwriters and artists understand the personal value of making something using your own thoughts. You should want to write in character: not borrowing someone else’s consciousness, but using your own. Think of Bruce Springsteen agonizing for days over song lyrics in the recent film, Deliver Me from Nowhere (2025). The whole film is about his process of rhetorical invention. In my case, explorations of the subject of human communication are endlessly fascinating: like a labyrinth of caves within a giant limestone formation. Writing is an act of discovery. It is a natural complement to reading, which is why we keep returning to people like Jane Austen, Joan Didion, or Christopher Hitchens.

                Hitchens

To be clear, I’m not talking about writing narrative fiction. I’m focused here on non-fiction writing of personal thoughts or arguments.  Any essay or survey of your own judgments or feelings should be interesting. If you make the effort, you might discover that you have a flair for revealing verbal imagery that opens up new perspectives  or insights.

Constructing written material involves a life-long learning curve.  Even so, here are a few suggestions here may be useful.

⇒ When faced with the challenge of putting more than a few thoughts together, pick the time of day when you are on your game. Writing is a high-order skill. It requires your total engagement and a minimum of distraction. I write in the morning and rewrite in the afternoon. Some flip this process and find the energy and creativity to write late at night. The point is to identify your sweet spot for being able to concentrate, giving yourself over completely to the task. Forget multitasking or a tv blasting in the background. Writing needs  full and unbroken concentration.

⇒ When staring at a blank page or screen, the goal is to start. Don’t let that blank space remain untouched for long. What your write first may end up at the end of the piece or be discarded. That’s fine, but start. First thoughts kickstart the whole process of discovering what you think or know. 

⇒ Edit later, but edit. All of us can benefit from good outside editors. But even when that is not an option, think like an editor, but after you’ve exhausted your creative efforts. Work first to generate ideas that you may want to amplify or develop. You will be a smarter reader of your own work after you have committed most of your ideas to the page. The amazing thing is how the generative process of writing is triggered by more writing. On some occasions you may find that this domino effect starts to take over. You think you are ready to stop, but your brain still is pouring out ideas that need to be captured. That’s a good sign you are getting into a productive groove. It is also a reminder to avoid overreliance on a prior outline, which can turn into a straitjacket that can cut off more spontaneous thinking.

⇒ Tame your word-processor. Don’t turn on so many features that it starts to take over the process that you should control. Sometimes auto-correct is way behind what you may have in mind. Ditto for artificial intelligence, which is the cobbling together thoughts from other people’s writing. More basically, A.I. will not be in your unique style. It’s a fake for what should be an extension of you and your feelings.

⇒ When editing, an online editor can help pick up obvious mistakes of spelling and grammar. An even more useful computer tool is the “read aloud” function in Word and other programs. I usually read by skimming. So my own fast read-through can miss what the read aloud function can reveal. We can be amazed at how well this tool reveals bad word choices, repetitious words (a common problem for me), and other forms of nonsense.

⇒Keep Reading. Most of our writing naturally improves as we absorb the work of accomplished and recognized writers.  Absorb the work of people who can hold a reader’s attention. Sometimes a good model is a piece of critical analysis you admire.

⇒ If you are making controversial or technical conclusions, do your reputation and your readers a favor by citing the sources used to support them. 

                             Lamott

⇒ Expect to do rewrites. As author Anne Lamott has noted “shitty first drafts” are the rule. What you wrote first may not be what you actually want to say. Paragraphs will probably need to be re-ordered. Overlapping ideas can be condensed. And clarifying early previews can be added or moved. (Sometimes the true point of an essay finally comes at the end: not an ideal place for your reader.) In short, give yourself time to polish your ideas.

Finally, writing offers a pleasant bonus to diligent scribes. If a first draft is crummy, the third or fourth may suddenly pick up speed and read like lightning. Hollywood mogul Jack Warner was hilarious but wrong; writers are so much more than “smucks with Underwoods.”

Triangulating Toward the Truth

retochet

It is not enough for a thinking adult to remain captive to the highly corrupted spaces of video fantasists.

With media such as YouTube, we have reached a point where the presumption going forward will have to be that the content is fake until it is verified.  More and more images and audio are A.I. fabrications.

Last week I was briefly taken in by the YouTube post, since taken down by the platform, that had columnist George Will describing a supposedly sudden transformation within the Republican Congressional caucus. He described their separation from President Trump, and even the possibility of using the 25th Amendment to remove the President from office. The video looked like Will and more or less duplicated his usually clipped cadences.

The first clue that all might not be what it seems was the source, which was not his newspaper, The Washington Post, but some sort of A.I. group called “Inside the Union.” A second was that the words put into Will’s mouth were not quite what he would use at this moment in time. Only a “synthetic content” flag visible for a short time in the corner of the video indicated that it is an A.I. fabrication.

My attention was initially heightened because I hoped the sudden report might be true. Alas, no one else at the AP, the New York Times, or The Wall Street Journal was reporting anything like this supposed GOP insurrection. Clearly Mr. Will had become an unwilling avatar for someone else’s political agenda.

short black line

Tech leaders who present themselves as in the forefront of the race to the future haven’t even left the starting blocks in terms of controlling the veracity of their offerings.

As we know, A.I. technology is capable of more convincing fakes. It was only a matter of time until fake news would become ubiquitous across the political spectrum. As noted in an earlier post, we may be OK with images of a cat minding the fry grill at McDonalds. The joke is obvious. But we should be on guard when the likeness of a person with a curated reputation is hijacked in complete defiance of what they actually believe. Elon Musk’s Grok image generator has similarly been used repeatedly to create false and malicious images that can end up on other sites. And, obviously, X, YouTube and other platforms are not immune.  Tech leaders who like to present themselves as in the forefront in the race to the future haven’t even left the starting blocks when it comes to controlling the veracity of their offerings.

A person’s reputation for accuracy may be the most important character trait they have. Routine fakery should not be allowed to rob them of that. Whether we want to or not, all of us are going to have learn to do what journalists and prosecutors do to test the credibility of their sources.

Their method is sometimes called “triangulation,” where a given story is checked against other sources known for credible reporting. To be sure, this takes a little bit of time. As landmark movies about journalism remind us, investigative reporters usually need two or three sources to confirm that a narrative is accurate. Think of All the President’s Men (1976), Shattered Glass (2003) or Spotlight (2015). The related and honorable practice of fact-checking is also a tradition at major news outlets and legendary at The New Yorker. In addition, triangulation usually means getting out of the video media bubble and moving on to more reliable human and print sources. It is not enough for a thinking adult to remain in the highly corrupted spaces of video fantasists.

All of this is a reminder schools should be regularly teaching some version of a course in Evidence and sources in the middle and upper grades. Every citizen needs to know what high and low credibility looks like, as well as some of the basic rules of evidence, Navigating the swamps of digital media where anything can be faked is going to require cognitive screening skills that will have to become second nature.